« prev   random   next »

3
0

Most mass shooters are black, not white, and media has never once reported this fact

By Patrick follow Patrick   2019 Aug 10, 8:55am 417 views   13 comments   watch   nsfw   quote   share    


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/07/after_gilroy_mass_shootings_a_white_thing_oh_hell_no.html

Even before the final butcher's bill was presented for the Sunday-night mass shooting in Gilroy, the blue checkers and talking heads were filling their platforms with fairy tales that most mass shooters are white.

But in the two-week run-up to Gilroy, there were 36 other mass shootings from coast to coast — and 34 of those shooters were black. One was white and one Hispanic. These results echo a New York Times story from 2016 that stated, much to the surprise and chagrin of the reporters, that whenever there are three or more victims of gunfire, 75 percent of shooters in America are black.

Today, that number looks a bit generous to black sensibilities.

But numbers from the New York Times and ten stories from good ol' Colin this year documenting hundreds of black mass shootings did not do much to remove the blinders of those who insist mass shootings are a white thing.

"Here's a fact that republicans are too stupid to grasp," said Mark K (@MarkRK47) on Twitter. "Every mass shooting in the US is carried out by a white supremacist. Every. Single. One."

Sibel Edmonds (@SibelEdmonds) chimed in to at least admit the possibility that not all mass shooters are white: "One hard hitting fact: In the chronic USA mass shooting incidents, in 99+% of the cases, the perpetrators: White, Anglo-Saxon, Christian, Americans."

Salon, the Daily Beast, Mother Jones, and other staples of the mass media cannot spread these fairy tales fast enough. The facts tell a different story — the opposite story.


As Colin Flaherty notes, 94 percent of the 36 mass shootings between July 16 and July 28, 2019 across the USA were committed by blacks.
1   Ceffer   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 10, 9:08am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Yes, but 400 years of oppression.
2   Quigley   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 10, 9:22am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Ceffer says
Yes, but 400 years of oppression.


It’s weird how fresh off the boat Africans do just fine,getting jobs, establishing successful businesses, and sending their children to Ivy League schools. If all this oppression is a skin color thing, why doesn’t it apply to these immigrants who are blacker than most of our local blacks?
3   6rdB   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 10, 9:24am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Quigley says
why doesn’t it apply to these immigrants who are blacker than most of our local blacks

It is because:
A. ORANGEMANBAD
B. Russians did it!
C. White Privilege
D. All three of the above.

Pick one.
5   CovfefeButDeadly   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 10, 11:59am     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Over the decades the msm has gone from exposing govt, to being govt supporters, to questioning everything and again exposing govt, to championing left wing and socialist causes, to currently being a propagandist for the Democrat Party.

In the 80’s and 90’s there were several local horrific crimes committed by blacks against whites that SHOULD have been nationwide news. They were that horrific. But the msm organizations intentionally did not run them(all were on the AP wire) because they were fearful of causing a race riot. Most of these were home invasions with black suspects and white victims and resulted in multiple deaths. The worst was two black men in ...I can’t remember if it was Mississippi or Arkansas...kidnapped a boy and repeatedly raped him and then killed him. At the time Drudge carried the story and it had a quote from the head of one of the big three network news agencies saying they wouldn’t run the story for fear of whites then attacking blacks.

I really don’t understand at this point how anyone trusts abc, cbs, nbc, and doesn’t realize that cnn msnbc, nyt, wapo, etc are strictly propaganda and not to be trusted in any way.
6   Fortwaynemobile   ignore (2)   2019 Aug 10, 12:26pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

Facts are racist, hence not allowed.
7   Ceffer   ignore (3)   2019 Aug 10, 12:30pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

"Elizabeth Warren promises reparations to the entire continent of Africa in exchange for votes and a smidgen of DNA for her next test!"
8   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 10, 1:01pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I got into it the other day with no less than Pitcavage of ADL.

As soon as I said, "Well, what is the weighted demographic breakdown of murderers and mass shooters?"

He said "Ah, you want to bring race into it."

I said "You're the one who posted the graphic of "White Supremacist" deaths. I guess you know that breaking down by demographics ain't good for your Narrative."

(Or words to these effect).

True Story, Bro . (Really True, I was arguing with some dumbass Unitarian and he just popped in from the aether).
9   Patrick   ignore (0)   2019 Aug 10, 3:31pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

I always suspect that media articles are about race are primarily designed to prevent people from thinking about or debating the extremely low taxes on billionaires:

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2009/03/why-buffett-pays-less-than-his-secretary/1616/
10   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Aug 10, 4:04pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

:
So you're going to define mas shootings as any time 3 or more people are shot (in gang wars or whatever) even if there are no suspects, but possibly it's correct to assume the shooter (or multiple shooters) were black ?

That's not what I would call mass shooting.

But I fully understand why you want to turn attention away from the mass shooting (usual definition - random well intentioned citizens shot while going about their otherwise safe business in school, church, mcdonalds or shopping mall, work place offices, or concert etc ) some of which seem to have been done by Trump supporting haters.
11   marcus   ignore (10)   2019 Aug 10, 4:05pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

By the way patrick what happened that causes posts for some of us (I'm guessing based on size of icon, to have our comments indented ?

I sometimes put a semicolon spacer there becasue I don't like the way it looks.
12   CornPoptheOriginalGangster   ignore (5)   2019 Aug 10, 4:32pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

marcus says
But I fully understand why you want to turn attention away from the mass shooting (usual definition - random well intentioned citizens shot while going about their otherwise safe business in school, church, mcdonalds or shopping mall, work place offices, or concert etc ) some of which seem to have been done by Trump supporting haters.


That is not the commonly accepted Law Enforcement definition of Mass Shooting.

That is the Left/Media's definition, carefully designed to exclude the most common types of shooting, which are Urban, with Pistols, over Drugs/Gangs.

A crazy dude shooting up is work is no LESS a mass shooting than TaShawn doing a drive by on MLK Road.
13   jazz_music   ignore (13)   2019 Aug 10, 4:51pm     ↓ dislike (0)   quote   flag        

None of them are rich at all,

It seems they are very angry and frustrated over their future prospects, and having trouble getting by.

about   best comments   contact   one year ago   suggestions